Win us with honest trifles

Thoughts on the Relief Canyon Debacle

Long-term readers of this humble corner of cyberspace will know its opinion of Americas Gold & Silver (USAS) (USA.to), a disaster of a company that has made a long-term mess of mining in three different countries over the Americas continent and only manages to survive because of schmoozy Blasutti, a CEO with his tongue so far up Eric Sprott’s rectum he also provides pre-digestive poisons checks for his lord and master’s victuals. Therefore, when USAS added “...and Provides Operational Update” to the end of Monday’s NR entitled “Americas Gold and Silver Corporation Reports First Quarter 2021 Results…“, then proceeded to explain the FUBAR at Relief Canyon, there wasn’t much surprise registered at this desk. Not so the market, of course, which did this to the stock price…

…but point of fact didn’t truly punish USAS and Blasutti, they’re only back at the insto-designated reset price.

Instead of going to where they should be going. That is zero, ladies and gents, because even now USAS isn’t being straight with you about the issues faced by Relief Canyon. We can pick up the thread in the Monday NR too, because the offered excuse sticks out like a sore thumb:

“As part of this analysis, the Company identified naturally occurring carbonaceous material within the Relief Canyon pit. The identification of this material was not recognized in the feasibility study.”

Oh cute, passive voice. By whom? When? Where? So it was off to SEDAR for this pseudo anal yst, the 2018 feasibility study compiled by MDA and the thing that stands out isn’t how the material “was not recognized” in as much as it was ignored. Supposedly FS, the distinct lack of met testing on show would be telling in a PEA and my stars, it screams at you here. A table, a screenshot…

…which shows all the test result averages from five different gold-bearing mineralizations at the project. Scant already, now focus in on the problem child “LSBXL”, designated because it’s limestone breccia with low cyanide solubility,. Time to quote the 43-101:

The limestone breccia with low cyanide solubility composite (2-LSBXL) gave significantly lower gold recoveries than the four other composites. Gold recoveries for the crushed feeds were somewhat erratic and ranged from 16.7 percent at the 80 percent -3/4 inch feed size, to 30.8 percent at both the 100 percent -2 inch and 80 percent -3/8 inch feed sizes. Gold recovery from the 80 percent -200M feed was moderately higher (40.0 percent). There were some indications of a mild preg-robbing character for this composite. Locking of contained gold in sulfide mineral grains or in silica are among other possible explanations for the low gold recoveries obtained from this composite.

You just read a 43-101 compiler whistling past a graveyard. Take a closer look at the LSBXL results using five different treatments and you see they got recoveries of 16.7%, 28.6%, 30.6%, 30.8% and 40.0%, so it’s already fun to see how that got to average 38.5%. But the above table also shows the Master tests, i.e. what the clever people expect from recoveries once the whole deposit is under operation and blended on the leach pads. Those vary from 72.7% to 81.8% and ultimately, a main input for costs assumptions. To do that they must have assumed encapsulation rather than preg-robbing and that shows in this column test result table, these guys just blended their percentage recoveries with the amount of each rock type. If this is FS-level work, I’m Bob Moriarty’s punkah wallah:

This desk invites you to spend time with that 43-101 document and read it more closely, if you do, it’s highly likely you’ll come to the same conclusions about it. Pershing, MDA and ultimately USAS rested the fate of their mine on the met results of a tiny proportion of their deposit. Just five composites from the main zone, each of which crushed to four or five size and from those 20 or so results they got the numbers they wanted from most of them. However, when one area of the pit returned persistently low recoveries and the compiler suspected preg-robbing, instead of any further investigation, checking, met work, drilling, follow-up, or time to consider the potential of an epic failure, USAS ploughed ahead and pretended it didn’t matter. This is how the joke end of mining works, the worst management teams imaginable, full of their own self-importance and deal-making abilities, but unable to use a pocket calculator, or consider new risk, or damage in any way their carefully preened image. There are only so many billionaires to fellate, Darren.


    Mark check out table 13.3 in the FS: 40% of total metallurgical drilling hit ‘limestone breccia’. No carbonaceous preg-robbing material in limestones, amirite?


      Makes you wonder whether Sandstorm bothered with all that data room nonsense before signing on.


        One would think Sandstorm had their fair share of total failures in the past and learned how to do proper dd since then. I remember Relief Canyon having most of its resource below the water table, with low grade and low recoveries, and as such always a problem for operators in the past. Dream team Frost, Honig, Alfers at Pershing. MDA is a name to remember it seems.


        Given the deal terms between Sandstorm and USAS I wouldn’t be surprised if they saw this and figured they’ll be able to dump the converts before the market wakes up, which they did, and collect their gold payments from the other ops. USAS goes bust, NewCo picks up RC as an exploration project and SAND has a royalty on 200 km^2 in NV during a bull market. Regardless, at this point SAND financing a mine is about as bright a red flag as Sprott Lending financing a mine.


          Sandstorm’s role in this is quite amazing. Did they bother opening the 43-101s?


            We’ll never know re: Sandstorm. No use speculating.
            Also interesting that MDA signed off on this given their reputation for being conservative, and did so shortly before the RESPEC merger and before some of the old-timers retired. Gustin and Ristorcelli notably are not authors.

    No surprise. For those who would have forgotten. USA bought Relief Canyon from Pershing Gold. A shit company that has always delayed commercial production.
    Barry Honig was a director and founder of Pershing Gold ((also the founder of RIOT Bitcoin. That guy can mine anything…) was a stock promoter who even managed to get convicted by the SEC.
    There has never been and never will any commercially minable gold in Relief Canyon.

    slernon rhode island 21/05/21 7:01 am

    This mine sucked back when it was with the huckster Honig under the ticker PGLC. Relief Canyon was/is a hole in the ground with a liar standing on top of it.


    Even Coeur Mining, who has never done an effective due diligence on any property in their history, finally walked away from Pershing Gold Relief Canyon project, even though it is next to Coeur’s Rochester Mine. One of the primary reasons? Preg robbing carbon that Pershing did everything they could to minimize as a concern. Of course the senior managers at Pershing were convinced that they had a turn key operation, laughable when you looked at the whole project.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Hello, you are not in a chatroom, you are in my living room. Opposing views and criticisms welcome, insults or urinating on furniture unwelcome. Please refrain from swearing if possible, it is not needed.