Take physic, pomp

Hey, maybe there were some rich and influential Chinese people in Davos this year

Ya think?
Pre-Davos, The IKN Weekly chose to feature the following in IKN349, dated January 17th 2016:

China’s GDP is only growing by 2.5% per annum

This is one of those pieces that
could be part of the “politics” section above, but in the end I’ve plumped on
putting it here. But no matter where it goes, it’s interesting and has the
potential to affect a lot of mining issues, so get ready for this message to
gain greater traction.

Professor Xavier Sala i Martin (a
Catalan last name, for what it’s worth) of Columbia University is no
lightweight and he’s about to get a platform on the world stage, being as he is
co-author of “The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016” published by the
World Economic Forum (Davos shindig coming very soon).

He’s been warming up for Davos by
touring South America this week and the message he’s offering is a simple one:
China isn’t growing its GDP by a 6.5% or 7% rate as per the official figures,
it’s more akin to 2.5%

“China data are the type that
mathematicians would call “complex numbers”, that’s to say half real and half
imaginary” he says, as quoted by the media in Chile, a country that really
cares about the China growth number due to its dependence on copper exports and
its relatively serious nature on finance and economy. The report on his
presentation continues in this way (translated) (26):

According to the
economist, there are two measurements that show Chinese GDP growth is less than
that announced by Beijing. The first is called the Li Keqiang Index, named in
honour of the current Prime Minister. This indicator is the one the government
follows in order to make decisions on macroeconomic policy, includes
measurements on the movement of containers on trains/through ports etc, electrical
consumption and financial credit/debt figures. According to this index the
country is growing by 2.5%.

The second measurement is
a study that Mr. Sala i Martin made that will appear in the February edition of
the Quarterly Journal of Economics (hey coincidence, just in time for Davos).
The expert analyzed NASA satellite photographs and measured the quantity of
light in each pixel, with each one equivalent to 1km2 on the ground. Each
square has 63 different light intensities, which is “perfectly” correlated to
GDP. “Today, if you calculate the luminosity that comes from the NASA
satellites, China is also growing at 2.5%”, he said.
Post Davos, now that the same bunch of economists have had their say in front of the Very Important People, the Very Important People have said some stern words to other Very Important People who have decided to Do Something and all of a very sudden we now have the NYT on the case:

Inquiry in China Adds to Doubt Over Reliability of Its Economic Data

HONG KONG — The veracity of China’s economic data has been increasingly
questioned as the slowing pace of the country’s growth has startled the
world. And a new investigation into the official who oversees the
numbers is unlikely to inspire confidence.
It’s how the sausage is made, folks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Hello, you are not in a chatroom, you are in my living room. Opposing views and criticisms welcome, insults or urinating on furniture unwelcome. Please refrain from swearing if possible, it is not needed.