Take physic, pomp

Regarding Almadex (AMZ.v) and its ‘El Cobre’ project (from IKN399, last weekend)

Here’s a short piece that made last weekend’s edition of The IKN Weekly, IKN399 dated January 8th. At that time Almadex (AMZ.v) was a $1.65 stock and here we are, three days later and 17% lower. The only edit is the removal of the names of the two copper stocks I currently own.


Regarding Almadex
(AMZ.v) and its ‘El Cobre’ project
Since August last year (get used to
referring to 2016 like that) Almadex Minerals (AMZ.v), the spin-out of Almaden
(AMM.to) (AAU) and run by the Poliquins, has been returning assay results from
its El Cobre project in Veracruz State, East coastal Mexico. Here’s an example
(12) of one of the earliest NR in the series (I think) dated August 8th and this
NR (13) will take you to the latest release that’s headlined this way:
Almadex Hits 240.00 Meters of 0.22% Copper and 0.50 G/T Gold
Within 646.38 Meters of 0.15% Copper and 0.30 G/T Gold Which Also Includes
469.00 Meters of 0.18% Copper and 0.38 G/T Gold in Hole EC-16-017 at the Norte
With “El Norte” referring to one of
the targets inside the larger ‘El Cobre’ project. AMZ at El Cobre is a project
I’ve kept one eye on these last few months (though you’ll note without even
mentioning it so far, let alone buying any shares, so when reader PB shot over
this mail on Friday…
“Care to comment on either
your blog or in the Weekly regarding Almadex’s new drill results?  My main
concern regarding this project is that it is in Veracruz and I remember Goldgroup
Mining’s success with Caballo Blanco.  From the property descriptions
provided by Almadex (about 75 kms northwest of the city) and Candelaria Mining
(65 km northwest of the city), they could be as close as 10 kms to each
other.  Thanks.”
…it nudged me into making a first
comment about the project. So here we go:
1) Yes, I’m concerned about its
geographical location as well. PB noted the “success” of Keith Piggott and
Goldgroup at Caballo Blanco (he was being ironic) and the way the project was
shot down for environmental and community protest reasons (and by the way,
Candelaria Mining is untouchable today for the same reason), but we also need
to note that Almaden sold Caballo Blanco to Goldgroup. At El Cobre, the Poliquins
know exactly where they are.
2) Up to date the assays widths
have been very good, there’s obviously a large mineralized body, but for my
taste it’s a long way from being a orebody and the main issue is that of grade.
It’s a little early to be accurate about overall grades there, but taking the
assays so far, averaging out, being reasonably generous to the upside and
sticking a thumb in the air, I’m going to assume at this point an average grade
of 0.2% copper and 0.3 g/t gold. Sorry folks, that’s not enough to float my
boat for a non-surface sulphide mineralization and to illustrate that here’s a simple
table (stuck together in about ten minutes) using those grades,
reasonable-to-generous recoveries (90% Cu, 75% Au) and a range of metals prices
to give a “what’s that rock worth?” spreadsheet table:
AMZ.v: El Cobre rock
worth/tonne at various mkt prices (U$/mt)
Assuming avg grade of 0.2%
copper, 0.3 g/t gold, 90% Cu and 75% Au recoveries
Gold/oz U$
Copper/Lb U$
source: IKN calcs from AMZ
3) I’ve picked out the U$2.50/lb
copper and U$1,200/oz result for reference purposes (a “rock worth” of
U$18.60/tonne) but even at U$1,500/oz gold and U$3.00/lb copper the numbers
involved aren’t that great. Now I’d agree there are a few mines in the world
today that can run super-low opex and make money on that kind return per tonne,
but they’ve been built already and the capex is paid off. In today’s
environment those grades make margins too skinny for capex and opex combined,
it’s way down the pecking order for copper or copper/gold projects, in short it
doesn’t work.
So why care? For one thing, at its
current C$73m approx market cap it’s getting a lot of valuation for what, so
far at least, is a pretty mediocre return. That implies AMZ is getting
speculative holders who are betting the company finds something better at the
project as the drill program continues, which fits in with the message in the
latest NR that, “…the Company interprets that a distal and high level portion
of a porphyry system with significant gold values has been intersected”. In
other words, AMZ and its backers are betting that 1) they haven’t found the
best-grading guts of this system yet and 2) they can find it. Which is fine,
well and good but as things stand today this company and its stock is not for
me. Instead of betting on AMZ and that two-fold risk of whether they
find economic higher grading rock, I much prefer to bet on (two names removed)
because I know they have higher grading rock. As the market has baked in
plenty of positive assumptions here, there looks to be plenty of downside risk
already in AMZ and the comparative value isn’t good. Now yes, for sure they
could hit the jackpot and announce a big bad 1,000m of 0.7g/t gold as the first
hole of this year’s campaign and if so, there’s many multiple of upside in the
game and that’s why I have my eye on the stock. But it’s watching brief only at
this time, because in my opinion (two names removed) are clearly better
propositions on what we know today.
Bottom line: AMZ looks expensive on
what we know today, plus there’s the potential of difficult environmental and
community relations further down the pipeline, but it’s by far from a lost
cause because there’s plenty of exploration potential and you never know, they
may be able to deliver on their theory, drill into the main porphyry and
suddenly hand over world class results to the market, instead of the mediocre
ones we’ve seen to date. AMZ is on watching brief, but at today’s prices I’m
not a buyer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Hello, you are not in a chatroom, you are in my living room. Opposing views and criticisms welcome, insults or urinating on furniture unwelcome. Please refrain from swearing if possible, it is not needed.